ben_zine ([info]ben_zine) wrote,
@ 2007-09-13 04:54:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current mood:ablaze with frustration
Entry tags:bioshock, drm, firstworldproblems, gaming, securom

Moderately open letter to 2K Games about BioShock and SecuROM

I'm frustrated with the BioShock. I want to buy it, but I can't; and I want it badly enough that my frustration has fuelled a letter rather than just a decision not to purchase the game.

The 2K Games BioShock forum has a thread on the topic. It seems that I am far from the only person who feels this way. Also, many of the people I asked for copyediting and proofreading advice mentioned that they would like to express support for my contention; it was not my intention to do anything but send this letter in by registered mail, representing only myself, but I certainly don't mind if others weigh in as well.

My plan is to print out the following next Friday (the 21st), modulo any good content advice received before then; to count up the number of people who respond to this post with anything containing the words "me too"; to include that number along with a link to this page as an addendum; and to send the whole mess to 2K Boston, 2K Games, and Take Two Interactive by registered mail. I'll probably toss over a copy to Elizabeth Tobey over at the Cult of Rapture, since she is keeping in touch with the fanbase.

I don't expect this to accomplish anything specific beyond venting my own frustration. I can hope, though.

Dear 2K Games,

Thank you for BioShock. It has lived up to the System Shock legacy, garnered glowing critical praise, and raised the bar for graphics, gameplay and writing. Congratulations: you've earned it!

On the other hand, BioShock has deeply disappointed me. I can't buy it, and I can't play it. Here's why.

My friends and I are avid, dedicated gamers. We have huge libraries encompassing classic adventures to the very latest console titles. Games are as important to us as books, movies and music; they are points in the history of the gaming industry and in our own lives. It's wonderful to dust off an old game and spend a rainy Sunday afternoon strolling down memory lane in the Great Underground Empire, or Britannia, or Citadel Station, or Hell.

Control software requires us to rely either on publisher benevolence for future replayability or on the skills of the game-cracking underground. I can trust only the latter, since the stance of the former has repeatedly been made crystal clear. I appreciate assurances of future unlocking, but only software crackers have delivered.

I use my computer for serious work, and I write software for personal, pedagogical and public purposes. A reliable, transparent and deterministic computer is a necessity for this, not a luxury. SecuROM makes even installing BioShock a non-starter.

I maintain many computers for my employer, family and friends, and myself; I know too well the headaches that SecuROM causes and I won't pay for that pain. I must refuse to support systems with it installed - reluctantly, since stranding friends is anathema, but refusal is the only reasonable action. SecuROM is not open or reviewed software. Its threat model includes the user performing actions on his or her own machine. It claims administrative control of the user's system. When opaque software does this, the computer can and must no longer be trusted.

I encourage my friends to do their own research, starting with your FAQ. Those who read up on the topic more often than not decide against purchasing your game.

Principle is also at stake. It is wrong and unfair that your ardent, honest fans must jump through hoops - managing activations, juggling discs, surrendering user choice about acceptable hardware and software - while those who play without paying, those whom you ought to discourage and inconvenience, instead enjoy a better experience.

Playing an illegitimate copy would perhaps satisfy my technical and historical objections, but it would neglect the equally important points of system and ethical integrity. I must emphasize that this is not an option.

Control software punishes only users who try to do the right thing. Regardless of intent, requiring that SecuROM be installed treats every user as a threat and a thief, and a lazy one, since cracked copies are widely available. It is technically painful; demonstrably ineffective; offensive and condescending; and it deeply compromises the playability of your game. This is not acceptable.

This is not acceptable.

I write regretfully, but with optimism. If I thought there were no chance of changing your mind, I would not have bothered. You can still do the right thing. I'll be the first in line to purchase BioShock when it is sold in an acceptable format, but neither I nor anyone I can influence will purchase games on your current unreasonable terms.

Your fan,

[me]




(11 comments) - (Post a new comment)

if it makes you feel any better
[info]meghanrose
2007-09-13 09:47 am UTC (link)
Geoff was drooling at the prospect of Bio-Shock. He bought it, played it, and was incredibly disappointed. So maybe you aren't missing too much.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: if it makes you feel any better
[info]ben_zine
2007-09-14 04:51 am UTC (link)

That's a shame to hear! I'm sorry that he was disappointed. Is Geoff a fan of the first two Shock games too?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: if it makes you feel any better
(Anonymous)
2007-09-15 01:17 am UTC (link)
Short review: the first 10-15 minutes of the game are awesome. Best opening sequence to a game, ever. That was basically the demo, so that, coupled with all the amazing reviews, made me buy the game. But after a few more hours, it just got...kind of boring. From all the press one reads about the games, it is made out to have a great atmosphere, with lots of interesting stories told through audiologs, and a living reactive environment. It has some of these things, occasionally, but mostly it's spoiled by the fact that the vast majority of the time, there are far too many enemies, and you spend all your time shooting them.

The fights with the big daddys are entertaining the first few times, but then they also grow rather dull - after all, you're really just fighting the same enemy again and again. To top it off, I didn't find that story actually that interesting - again, at first it is very neat, but then grows dull.

I know this all sounds very negative, but I think my expectations were raised by S.T.A.L.K.E.R. I think it did what Bioshock was trying to do far better - have a living, interactive environment, tell a story in pieces, etc. In addition, it did a far better job of giving you choices about who to fight and when, rather than making the game a constant battle against hordes of enemies.

I only played little bits of the system shock games, as they never worked very well on the computers I had. The bit of SS2 I played scared the hell out of me (in a good way). From the same people, I *loved* Ultima Underworld. I really wish someone would re-make that game.

- M's G

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(Reply from suspended user)
pretty good
[info]offby1.myopenid.com
2007-09-13 01:29 pm UTC (link)
I don't play games so I can't say "me too", but your letter is about as well-written as it could be.

I guess it'll have roughly no effect ... _unless_ 2K receives a buttload of similar letters.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: pretty good
[info]ben_zine
2007-09-14 04:55 am UTC (link)

Thanks for the feedback, offby1! Riastradh helped polish and clarify a few of the fine details and catch a few pronoun errors - it's nice to have friends who are language pedants!

I'm guessing it'll have no effect either, and I really don't think that they'll receive many protest letters. That particular form of protest seems to be totally foreign to most of the gaming market, if not the entire gaming generation. Crying shame, that. 2K Games, 2K Boston and Take Two certainly don't make it easy to snail-mail things to them, either - I haven't been able to dig up addresses yet. Still, I've got another week.

Again, thanks for taking the time to read over that little rant. I appreciate it.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]terr
2007-09-14 02:45 pm UTC (link)
2K Boston
1515 Hancock St # 305, Quincy, MA
(617) 269-0424

I'd check via the phone number listing before mailing, though, as that address may be out of date.

Anyway, if you want to play Bioshock, you should rent the 360 version and visit me in Montreal. I bought a 360... as much as I'm no MS fan, the capitalist in me always buys the system that looks to have the best games every generation. I refuse to fall into the "this company does THIS, and that company does THIS!" mentality that appears to be a pretty slippery slope into fanboyism; my gaming 'career' has gone Atari (2600), Nintendo (SFC), Sony (PSX), Sony (PS2), Microsoft (360). Hey, those first two were pretty great companies. And, while Sony wasn't awesome, I ended up pirating everything except the games I truly wanted to support (Ben, you MUST play Persona 3. If needed, I will lend you it when I'm done, but that might be a while. Also, Growlanser V in three days!). I must say though, I dig the micropayment casual game set-up they have on 360; the only games I've paid for are all XBLA games.

Why am I writing all of this? I am super internet-talkative today. It's weird. Anyway, hope that info helps out. (I google-mapped "Irrational Games" with the image centered over Boston. Ta-da!)

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(Reply from suspended user)
BIOSHOCK OFFLINE
(Anonymous)
2008-02-26 02:33 pm UTC (link)
IF YOU WANT TO PLAY BIOSHOCK OFFLINE THEIR IS A NO DVD FIX , BUT YOU MUST FIRST INSTALL GAME THEN WHEN INSTALLER ATTEMPTS TO GO ONLINE TO DOWNLOAD EXE, USE ALT TAB TO ACCESS YOUR DESKTOP AND FROM THEIR GO TO THE DEFAULT INSTALATION DIRECTORY FOR BIOSHOK EG 2K GAMES ON C AND COPY THE ENTIRE FOLDER INTO A DIFFERENT LOCATION EG A NEW FOLDER AND PRESS CANCEL ONLINE ACTIVATION . NOW YOU HAVE A COPY OF THE INSTALLED FILES AND ALL YOU NEED TO DO IS COPY THE NO CD FIX INTO THE CORRECT DIRECTORY . I BOUGHT THE ORIGINAL GAME AND USED THIS FIX AND IT WORKS FINE...HOPE THAT HELPS ....PS I REALISE THAT YOU MAY NOT READ THIS AS ORIGINAL POST WAS A LONG TIME AGO ....BUT MAYBE IT WILL HELP OTHERS

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: BIOSHOCK OFFLINE
[info]ben_zine
2008-02-27 03:25 am UTC (link)
I APPRECIATE YOUR NOTE, BUT ALTHOUGH YOU'RE RIGHT ABOUT IT PROVIDING YOU A WORKING VERSION OF THE GAME WITHOUT REQUIRING THE DVD TO BE IN THE DRIVE, IT DOES NOT ADDRESS THE ISSUES OF..:

- THE INSTALLATION PROCESS STILL BEING DEPENDENT ON A SERVER WHICH MAY NOT STAY UP FOR TWO, FIVE, TEN YEARS OR HOWEVER LONG YOU CHOOSE TO CARE ABOUT;
- THE SECUROM COPY-PROTECTION SYSTEM WHICH IS STILL ACTIVATED WHEN ONE FOLLOWS THE PROCESS THAT YOU DESCRIBE;
- THE QUESTIONABLE LEGALITY AND CODE QUALITY OF THE NO-DVD FIX, WHICH HAS BEEN CREATED BY ANONYMOUS PARTIES AND WHICH HAS UNDERGONE NO QUALITY, SAFETY OR TRUSTWORTHINESS REVIEW, EITHER PUBLICALLY OR INTERNALLY;
- FINANCIALLY SUPPORTING A COMPANY THAT CONSIDERS ALL OF THE ABOVE ONEROUS WORKAROUNDS TO BE WORTH IMPOSING ON ALL OF THEIR CUSTOMERS IN ORDER TO WIN WHAT TURNED OUT TO BE LESS THAN TWO WEEKS OF COPY PROTECTION.

NEVERTHELESS, I APPRECIATE THE SPIRIT IN WHICH YOUR COMMENT WAS POSTED - THANK YOU.

ALSO, YOUR CAPS-LOCK KEY IS BROKEN. YOU MAY WANT TO LOOK INTO THAT.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Do you mind if i borrow and edit this for the Spore DRM
(Anonymous)
2008-05-08 09:13 am UTC (link)
I would like to use the basis of your letter and make some amendments to closer fit my personal circumstances and update it regarding the new DRM due to be released with spore. I am not quite so elequient as your self and would probably run off on a rambling rant with out some structure to work from.
Cheers
Steven

(Reply to this)


(11 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…